Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has decided against creating a state-run health insurance exchange required to implement a key part of President Barack Obama's federal healthcare law.
Brewer's decision announced Wednesday means that it will be left to the federal government to set up an exchange for the state.
The exchange will provide consumers with an online marketplace to buy subsidized health coverage.
Brewer said there are too many costs and too many questions associated with a state-run exchange.
Her announcement comes ahead of a Dec. 14 deadline for states to declare whether they'd run their own exchanges.
Arizona Democrats were quick to attack the governor's decision. House Minority Leader Chad Campbell of District 14 called it "an irresponsible decision."
"The state has already spent millions of dollars developing the infrastructure to support the exchange," Campbell said. "The governor is going to throw that all away so she can push an extremist agenda. We've come to expect political grandstanding from her, but this is a whole new level."
House Minority Whip Anna Tovar of District 13 expressed concern about the financial impact the governor's decision will have on the state.
"The governor is limiting our options and this will damage the economy," Tovar said. "Even if state-owned insurance companies are permitted to operate under a federally-run exchange, they will be subject to dual regulation in one marketplace. Smaller companies may not have adequate resources to compete and may be driven out of business."
Here is Brewer's full text of her announcement:
"Today, I notified the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that the State of Arizona will not create a state-based Health Exchange. This decision comes following an extensive research and outreach process during which my team of health advisors conducted public hearings and met with HHS, patient advocates and representatives of Arizona hospitals, health providers, insurers, tribal groups and other members of the health care community.
"This has been one of the more difficult decisions of my career in public service. My opposition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unwavering, as is my belief that it should be repealed and replaced with legislation that achieves its stated goals: to improve access to quality, affordable health care in this country. But I am also aware that the ACA remains the law of the land. Likewise, though I am a steady advocate of local control, I have come to the conclusion that the State of Arizona would wield little actual authority over its 'state' Exchange. The federal government would maintain oversight and control over virtually every aspect of our Exchange, limiting our ability to meet the unique needs of Arizonans and the Arizona insurance market.
"A state Exchange would be costly. Though the federal government has pledged to pay nearly all startup costs, states that form their own health exchanges are on the hook for operational expenses beginning in 2015. Those costs could total $27 million to $40 million annually for the State of Arizona, according to a recent study conducted by Mercer. Of course, these expenses would be passed along in the form of fees resulting in higher health premiums for Arizona families and small businesses. This would be an additional financial burden at a time when so many Arizonans are still struggling.
"Lastly, there simply remains too much we don't know about how a State-based Exchange would function and its ultimate cost to taxpayers. Without clear federal guidance and instruction, I cannot in good conscience commit the taxpayers of my state to this costly endeavor.
"The State of Arizona has a long history of health care innovation. Our Medicaid program, AHCCCS, has been a national model of cost-efficient care for three decades, and our pioneering pursuit of integrated health is designed to improve the quality of life for Arizonans living with serious mental illness. In this proud tradition, I remain committed to working with legislators to enact State reforms that improve care and reduce costs for Arizona families, while maintaining a vibrant and competitive health care marketplace."
Copyright 2012 CBS 5 (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
READ: AZ reaction heated from both sides on health care ruling (6/28/12) VIDEO: Healthcare mandate: Your questions (6/28/12) READ: Arizona to receive nearly $7M in health care grants (5/1/12) VIDEO:More>>
Tuesday, April 20 2010 11:21 PM EDT2010-04-21 03:21:00 GMT
31 people are in trouble with the law after a three day prostitution sting in Richmond. Police told NBC12 they targeted specific areas where residents and business owners complained about the illegal activity.More >
Monday, December 9 2013 10:05 PM EST2013-12-10 03:05:58 GMT
Relatives say three women shot to death in Connecticut in a suspected murder-suicide were a 28-year-old mother of a toddler and her two cousins. Family members tell The Associated Press the victims areMore >
Police have identified the man suspected of shooting three women in Manchester before turning the gun on himself.More >
Monday, December 9 2013 8:18 PM EST2013-12-10 01:18:16 GMT
Photo: Holiday Light Fantasia
Th Holiday Light Fantasia, which benefits the Channel 3 Kids Camp, was targeted by vandals in Goodwin Park over the weekend.Whoever is responsible for the destruction caused $1,500 in damage when the cutMore >
For the second year in a row, the display in Goodwin Park for Holiday Light Fantasia, which benefits the Channel 3 Kids Camp, was targeted by vandals.More >
Monday, December 9 2013 7:53 PM EST2013-12-10 00:53:08 GMT
A 3-judge panel have overturned five felony corruption convictions against former Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez, paving the way for new trials.The decision came down Monday morning.Perez was convicted ofMore >
A three-judge panel has overturned five felony corruption convictions against former Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez, paving the way for new trials.More >
Roughly three years ago, a man referred to in a federal indictment as "Visitor LF" went to Men's Central Jail to discuss his inability to visit his brother there. Instead, a Los Angeles County Sheriff's...More >
Roughly three years ago, a man referred to in a federal indictment as "Visitor LF" went to Men's Central Jail to discuss his inability to visit his brother there. Instead, a Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy...More >